Brief History of Boston High Tech
Introduction
This weekend I read Route 128, an out of print 1992 book that provides a retrospective on the 1980s “Massachusetts Miracle.” The book provides an engaging history of our high tech landscape, starting in the 1860s with the founding of MIT, and concluding in the early 1990s, before the start of the dot-com boom. Having recently read Scott Kirsner’s What’s the point of ‘Boston vs. Silicon Valley’, I thought it would be interesting to re-cap the narrative and conclusions of the authors, Susan Rosengrant and David Lampe.
Boston High Tech History
The underlying premise of Route 128 is that the long term success of the Massachusetts economy has been the result of the close association between a troika: academia, the federal government and private industry. The history starts with the Morrill Land Grant of 1862, which resulted in a rapid education expansion that made Boston the “Athens of America.” No university better led the way in the public-private partnership than MIT, founded 1861. But even before MIT, the entrepreneurial spirit of the local area ran deep, as demonstrated in its application to textile manufacturing, fishing, ship building, and even New England ice.
When World War II started, the unique academic and research infrastructure in eastern Massachusetts was leveraged in our national defense. The area became the center for research in microwaves for radar, which was second in federal research investment only to the Manhattan Project. This research resulted in the first practical digital computer, and sowed the early seeds of the US computer industry.
In the aftermath of World War II, the Route 128 highway was built around Boston, providing the transportation infrastructure to support the coming economic growth. At the same time, the public-private-academic partnership continued with the founding of Lincoln Labs, MITRE, and the Air Force’s Electronic Systems Division. The frugal 1950s were followed by rapid growth in the 1960s, followed again by an economic downturn in the 1970s.
Starting in the mid-1970s, Boston became the epicenter of the minicomputer revolution. The rapid growth in commercial demand for minicomputers created new local tech giants, including Digital Equipment Corporation, Wang, Prime Computer, Data General, and Apollo. This growth also spawned numerous spinoffs that helped solidify the transition of the local economy from its manufacturing base.
But the “miracle” was short-lived, as an underinvestment in early stage startups and the inability of the minicomputer manufacturers to respond to the personal computer shifted the balance of power in the Boston area. In a three year period, minicomputer manufacturers lost over 40,000 jobs, and the state ended the 1980s having lost its position as the most prominent high tech region in the US.
Advice from Route 128
The conclusions of the book are summarized in a section called Looking Forward. The authors’ advice for us, written in 1992, includes:
- Preserve & strength the educational and research infrastructure – Continue to work to attract the best talent to our schools, invest in academic research, and maintain a global perspective in our education.
- Recognize the special role of our unique high tech region – Maintain our investment in education and research infrastructure, and our active entrepreneurial community.
- Capitalize on the strengths of our state economy – Invest in strong primary and secondary education, market the state to private industry for research, and become thought-leader within academia, the federal government and private industry.
- Don’t over-manage the system – Let free-markets continue to build and maintain the diversity of the local economy.
- Celebrate the differences between academia, federal government and industry – Accept that the US system will result in partnerships within the troika, but never seamless cooperation.
- Encourage experimentation – Continue to explore new ways to harness the power of public-private partnerships to drive new innovation.
Conclusions
Many Boston high tech professionals will admit to a lingering wistfulness for the bygone years of our high tech dominance. In reading Route 128, I connected directly with this past. Our high tech roots run deep, and include firsts in almost all areas of our industry – from venture capitalism to computers to consulting.
While I doubt we’ll ever be content to being second best, maybe we can console ourselves that we are playing the long game. After all, by the time the Standford Industrial Park was started in the Silicon Valley, our first high tech startup (Saugus Iron Works) had been founded a full 305 years in our past.
I worked on 128 through the 80′s and 90′s until starting my own software “shack” in 2000. I haven’t read this book, but I can give you some interesting insight.
I think by the mid-80′s, 128 was pretty much on the decline and it was pretty clear most of the “buzz” was on the west coast.
Also, around the mid-80′s for 128 moved more towards the metro west area as well. This was mainly because things just got too expensive on 128 and more importantly, 128 was HELL to commute…
Companies like Prime Computer (which I was employed at from 1984 – 1989), Data General, Bytex, Bose, Stratus and various other companies that all decided to “go west” in favor of better rent, less traffic and larger tax breaks.
It was pretty clear that at the height of the 128 boom (late 70′s), the office space started to get not only expensive, but became harder to find. So a lot of these “startups” decided to venture more towards Framingham, Natick and Westborough. Which all offered more space at a better price.
It also broke up the pockets of talent that once was, and diluted the notion of 128 being the “technology highway”… it was over by the 90′s… in my opinion.
Today, I think most of the exciting companies are in Cambridge, Boston, Newton and Watertown — its closer to MIT, BU and Northeastern. And its far more attractive for people as you’re not commuting to Needham or Waltham, which (and no offense to those folks who live there) isn’t quite a cultural mecca.
One thing I’d like to add is that I think the competition between Boston and Silicon Valley is a bit unfair. I think the weather has a huge impact on where people want to live and work. This is a NASTY area to be commuting in during the winter months, and if you’ve ever visited the Palo Alto, San Fran area, its pretty clear the advantage is not only the fact that the weather is better there, but the overall “consistant” climate is far easier to deal with. You just know that on the worst days all you’ll have to deal with is rain — this attracts a lot of VC’s and money because, lets face it, if you had money and wanted to invest, where would you rather be in February? Boston or sitting on Knob Hill, or around the Stanford area (Palo Alto) having a drink with your potential investments…
I think all this is interesting, but I do think even Silicon Valley is going to wane in the future as the industry changes more towards a hybrid telecommuting situation. I see more and more companies building their business around NOT having a centralized home office but more towards hiring people in different locations, and maybe meeting once or twice a month in different parts of the country.
I recently worked with a partner of ours who’s development is in Austria, Spain and Canada. Their sales, marketing and support are in Burlington, and they have professional services in NY… None of which (except for Burlington) have “offices” and all work remotely…
This seems to be a growing trend, and its happening at the start up level. So I’m not sure how important a “geographical” region is anymore towards high tech startups and businesses.